Skip to Main Content

Effective Strategies to Improve Diversity, Equity and Inclusion in Pathology

January 30, 2022
  • 00:00Yes. At the end of our conversation today,
  • 00:04hopefully you'll be able to recall
  • 00:06the term underrepresented in medicine
  • 00:07as defined by the Association
  • 00:09of American Medical Colleges.
  • 00:10Describe historical and current
  • 00:12distribution of individuals
  • 00:13underrepresented in medicine or UIM,
  • 00:15both in training and practice,
  • 00:16with an emphasis on pathology.
  • 00:18Specific data.
  • 00:19Recognize how barriers retaining
  • 00:21individuals underrepresented in medicine
  • 00:23evolve at each station or career,
  • 00:25and then outline some key elements
  • 00:27for an impactful DI initiative.
  • 00:30Alright, but before we move forward,
  • 00:32we want to recognize the past and better
  • 00:35understand where we are coming from
  • 00:37and understand the context in which the
  • 00:39disparities that we currently see arose in.
  • 00:42And for those of you who are
  • 00:44readers or audiobook listeners,
  • 00:45I have no stake in this book,
  • 00:48but I think how the word is
  • 00:50passed is a really nice book.
  • 00:51For those of you to listen to,
  • 00:53and I think it really
  • 00:54emphasizes what I want to take.
  • 00:56Drill home with this part
  • 00:57of our conversation today,
  • 00:59which is there is.
  • 01:00The history that we know,
  • 01:02the issue that we're taught,
  • 01:03and then what actually happened and you know,
  • 01:06it's important to be cognizant of
  • 01:09what we thought we knew may not
  • 01:12be reflective of the actuality
  • 01:14of what we're seeing today.
  • 01:16So I want to just pause and recognize our
  • 01:18history in medicine and again of course,
  • 01:20history.
  • 01:20Medicine begins with segregation
  • 01:22and medicine with ***** versus
  • 01:24Ferguson upholding segregation.
  • 01:26And I think there are a few of us
  • 01:29that have some ties to Atlanta.
  • 01:30So I'd just like to highlight the
  • 01:32GREYDIS which is Grady Memorial
  • 01:34Hospital is built in the shape of
  • 01:36an age so that the white patients
  • 01:37were on one side of the H and
  • 01:39the colored patients are black.
  • 01:41Patients were on the other side of the
  • 01:43age and they had separate care teams.
  • 01:45Matt Hopkins at Hopkins was segregated
  • 01:48with the last inpatient unit being
  • 01:50desegregated in about the mid 1970s.
  • 01:53The first black pathology residents
  • 01:55didn't resident did not enter our program
  • 01:58until the year my brother was born,
  • 02:00so again,
  • 02:01segregation of medicine is a very real
  • 02:04thing and this is the real history
  • 02:06that we need to be cognizant of.
  • 02:09Speaking of the history that we
  • 02:10were taught and what you know the
  • 02:12the other aspects of the history
  • 02:13that we didn't necessarily know
  • 02:14the Flexner report we all learned
  • 02:16about the landmark Flexner report
  • 02:18published by Abraham Flexner.
  • 02:20Which is a comprehensive survey of
  • 02:22the US and Canadian medical schools
  • 02:24over the span of 18 or so months.
  • 02:26This was commissioned by the American
  • 02:29Medical Colleges Association Council
  • 02:31medical education and it sought
  • 02:33to reform and standardize medical
  • 02:34education and bring it into what
  • 02:36at the time was science and rigor
  • 02:39providing medical students with
  • 02:40an evidence based education and
  • 02:43institutions such as you know,
  • 02:45the Harverst the Hopkins stood
  • 02:46out as the landmark institutions
  • 02:48and that's what we were taught.
  • 02:50That's what I was taught.
  • 02:51I was taught that the Buckner port was.
  • 02:52Instrumental in revolutionising
  • 02:54medical education and really bringing
  • 02:56us forward and bringing science and
  • 02:58rigor again into medical education.
  • 02:59What I didn't learn was that there are
  • 03:02other chapters of the Flexner report.
  • 03:03There was chapter 13,
  • 03:04the medical education of women and
  • 03:06then chapter 14 medical education of
  • 03:08the ***** and learned about this.
  • 03:10Anecdotally, I don't know what
  • 03:12prompted me to just go look at
  • 03:13the look up the facts and report,
  • 03:15but I look I just decided to
  • 03:17read it one day and I know these
  • 03:19these these two chapters.
  • 03:20So if you look at chapter 13.
  • 03:23Medical education of women and it
  • 03:25briefly outlining the status of medical
  • 03:27education of women in early 20th century
  • 03:29and while Flexner noted that female
  • 03:32student enrollment was declining.
  • 03:34Flexner did note that there was a
  • 03:36clear role for women to be educated
  • 03:39and medicine and become physicians.
  • 03:41However,
  • 03:41they flex or noted that they
  • 03:43women had a decreased decreasing
  • 03:46inclination to enter medical school,
  • 03:48which was interesting.
  • 03:51Now,
  • 03:51as I mentioned,
  • 03:52the flexing report was Brett Rose
  • 03:53revolutionary in terms of.
  • 03:55Bringing science and rigor into
  • 03:56medical education,
  • 03:57but the the consequences at the medical
  • 04:01schools that Flexner felt did not have
  • 04:04the adequate resources or the OR the
  • 04:06whether they be physical resources.
  • 04:09Faculty resources,
  • 04:10whichever institutions that did
  • 04:12not have the resources.
  • 04:14Flexner spell all that out and
  • 04:16then recommended whether they be
  • 04:19closed or remain in existence.
  • 04:21And So what?
  • 04:21Flexner outlined in this Chapter
  • 04:2313 is that none of the three women
  • 04:25medical colleges at that time
  • 04:26could be sufficiently strengthened
  • 04:28without enormous select outlay,
  • 04:30and recommended their closure where
  • 04:31those medical school colleges was
  • 04:33actually in Baltimore as well.
  • 04:35Baltimore as well.
  • 04:37So the implications on the flexing
  • 04:39report for female medical education
  • 04:40there is decreasing female
  • 04:42enrollment with closure of medical
  • 04:44schools with trained female,
  • 04:45but also African American and
  • 04:47working class or socio economically
  • 04:49disadvantaged students.
  • 04:50This also occurred in a time when medical
  • 04:53schools still had some gender based
  • 04:55quotas and so even though there was.
  • 04:58Duckster was arguing that there needed
  • 05:00to be females educated in medicine.
  • 05:02The medical schools were not
  • 05:04forced to have or to get rid
  • 05:07of their gender based quotas.
  • 05:09So what about medical education and
  • 05:11the impact on African Americans?
  • 05:13So out of these seven African
  • 05:15American medical schools,
  • 05:16which were in existence at the time,
  • 05:18including Howard University College of
  • 05:19Medicine and Meharry Medical College,
  • 05:21Flexner argued that only two of
  • 05:24those seven medical schools were
  • 05:25able to provide a quality medical
  • 05:27education at the standards that
  • 05:29Flexner had argued were necessary.
  • 05:32With that in mind, he did,
  • 05:34however,
  • 05:34outline a fundamental need for properly
  • 05:37qualified education physicians.
  • 05:38I'll be at what they narrowed.
  • 05:39Scope of focus.
  • 05:40I'm more so on public health and
  • 05:43hygiene rather than subspecialty care.
  • 05:46So what are the long term implications?
  • 05:48Five of those seven medical colleges
  • 05:51were closed with Howard and Meharry
  • 05:53being the only two that were allowed to
  • 05:57remain open. Morehouse School of
  • 05:59Medicine didn't open until about the
  • 06:01mid 70s and then secondarily with the.
  • 06:05And fundamental need for qualified for
  • 06:09qualified African American physicians
  • 06:11outlined the the scope of practice was
  • 06:14narrowed to again primary care and public
  • 06:16health and hygiene with fewer African
  • 06:18American physicians educated in medical
  • 06:21specialties and the consequences that
  • 06:23there is diminished or decreased access
  • 06:25to subspecialty care for quite some time.
  • 06:28And we still see those profound disparities
  • 06:31in representation in subspecialties today,
  • 06:33including orthopedic surgery,
  • 06:35interventional radiology, cardiology, etc.
  • 06:37So these are some of the
  • 06:39long term implications,
  • 06:41but another one that is,
  • 06:42you know that that's the
  • 06:44elephant in the proverbial room.
  • 06:45Decrease exposure for diverse educational
  • 06:47environments for all medical students.
  • 06:49So not only are we talking about diminished
  • 06:51access to education for African Americans or
  • 06:54individuals underrepresented in medicine,
  • 06:56particularly at the time
  • 06:58indigenous Americans,
  • 06:59would it be included in that as well?
  • 07:01But then also,
  • 07:02on the flip side,
  • 07:04you had Caucasian students that were not,
  • 07:06or white students that were not being.
  • 07:08It educated an environment where
  • 07:11there was diversity.
  • 07:13But what about beyond education?
  • 07:15We had patient segregation in the wards
  • 07:17we talked about that with the greedies
  • 07:19and we talked about that at Hopkins.
  • 07:21But what about desegregation beyond awards?
  • 07:23What about in pathology?
  • 07:25So some of you historians may may
  • 07:27remember that our blood supply
  • 07:29was segregated for quite some time
  • 07:31up until about the mid 1950s,
  • 07:33or well into the mid 20th century.
  • 07:36And this is what this is a an image
  • 07:40published by Paul Hoxworth showing
  • 07:42what the blood storage refrigeration
  • 07:44units looked like,
  • 07:45where you had it on one side,
  • 07:46white blood and the other side colored blood.
  • 07:48And these would be taken from white or.
  • 07:51Brown donors and then stored in
  • 07:53separate areas of the blood bank and
  • 07:56only transfused to specific patients.
  • 07:59And this is also in pathology again.
  • 08:02So for those of you that have
  • 08:04ties to Hopkins,
  • 08:04this is our old original morgue and these
  • 08:07little white tags on the doors are for
  • 08:10white patients and colored patients.
  • 08:13And this is from Doctor Ralph Rubin
  • 08:15who shared this photo and I did touch
  • 08:17base with Doctor John Boitnott.
  • 08:20For those of you, again,
  • 08:21have some Hopkins ties.
  • 08:22Who confirmed that this was an
  • 08:25actual this was. This was real.
  • 08:27There were segregated storage,
  • 08:30refrigeration, sorry there was.
  • 08:33There was segregation in the morgue,
  • 08:35although they did not necessarily
  • 08:36always follow it.
  • 08:37And you know that that take
  • 08:39that for what it means.
  • 08:41But it was built with segregated morgues.
  • 08:45Alright, So what is the argument
  • 08:48for diversity in pathology?
  • 08:50Again, we talk about pathologists
  • 08:52and you know we don't typically see
  • 08:54our patients with the exception of
  • 08:57those and of those of us in forensics
  • 08:59or who those of us who do find
  • 09:02utile aspirations as pathologists,
  • 09:03we primarily look at,
  • 09:04you know tissue under the slides or
  • 09:06we look at blood and tubes and so
  • 09:08we're not seeing our patients and
  • 09:10so you could argue that I work we,
  • 09:12as pathologists,
  • 09:13work in a setting where bias doesn't have.
  • 09:15He doesn't have impact on our
  • 09:17clinical workflows.
  • 09:18We are not impacted by bias.
  • 09:21However,
  • 09:21that couldn't be further from the
  • 09:23truth and you don't necessarily need
  • 09:24to be seeing your patients to be 1
  • 09:27affected by bias or two to perpetuate
  • 09:29and exacerbate health disparities.
  • 09:31But beyond that, you know.
  • 09:34Again, thinking classically about
  • 09:35what workforce diversity does,
  • 09:37we classically think of you
  • 09:39know workforce diversity,
  • 09:40providing improved patient care
  • 09:41with patient provider, concordance,
  • 09:43and the provision of cultural.
  • 09:45Appropriate and patient centered care,
  • 09:47which again might not be as relevant
  • 09:49to most of us as pathologists,
  • 09:50with the exception of those of us
  • 09:52that do interact with patients.
  • 09:53However,
  • 09:54diversity has more has other ways
  • 09:56on touching on how we provide
  • 09:58care and how we can how it can
  • 10:00improve the way we provide care.
  • 10:03Not only does it help us
  • 10:04provide higher quality care,
  • 10:05but as well established that diversity in
  • 10:07the workforce helps increase innovation.
  • 10:09When you have diverse teams,
  • 10:11diverse teams bring increased awareness
  • 10:13of and emphasis on health and health care,
  • 10:15disparities,
  • 10:16diversification of clinical trials.
  • 10:18I think that's a really hot button
  • 10:19topic now that we're more aware of.
  • 10:21But this is something that's been
  • 10:23going on long for for quite some time,
  • 10:25including the post NIH Revitalization Act,
  • 10:28which mandates that the clinical
  • 10:30trials and studies that are receiving.
  • 10:32And age funds need to be thinking
  • 10:35mindfully about diversity,
  • 10:36increased workforce diversity
  • 10:38and touches on all these aspects.
  • 10:40Provision of high quality care,
  • 10:42clinical child diversity help
  • 10:43US verities focus innovation.
  • 10:45So even though we as pathologists are
  • 10:47not directly improving patient care
  • 10:49by patient provider, concordance,
  • 10:51or culturally appropriate and
  • 10:52patient centered care,
  • 10:53there are other ways that diversity
  • 10:55adds value to the work that we do.
  • 10:57And if you are,
  • 10:59you know somewhat of a skeptic
  • 11:01and you know disagree with those.
  • 11:04You know things that I advocate for
  • 11:06in terms of why diversity matters.
  • 11:08Diversity does bring in higher
  • 11:10financial performance with the
  • 11:12McKinsey analysis.
  • 11:13Looking at private sector companies
  • 11:15and looking at financial performance.
  • 11:17And they demonstrate that ethnically
  • 11:20diverse companies were outperform
  • 11:22or more likely to outperform their
  • 11:24non diverse businesses.
  • 11:25So even if there is a question of
  • 11:28whether or not diversity increases
  • 11:30innovation or increases emphasis
  • 11:32and awareness on health disparities.
  • 11:35Or improves the quality of care.
  • 11:37Fundamentally it is financially
  • 11:40beneficial to increase diversity.
  • 11:43So now that we understand the
  • 11:45framework for which we
  • 11:47are building,
  • 11:48our discussion on diversity upon,
  • 11:50let's talk about what we currently
  • 11:52observe the pathway into pathology,
  • 11:54and we understand that you know,
  • 11:55we as a as a medical as a
  • 11:58medical institution had were
  • 12:00segregated for quite some time,
  • 12:02and with that segregation
  • 12:04extending into a pathology space,
  • 12:05we recognize that the long term
  • 12:08impact of overt segregation and overt
  • 12:10exclusion in medical education is
  • 12:12still palpable today in terms of the
  • 12:14representation that we do not see.
  • 12:15In our medical specialties,
  • 12:17so where are we now?
  • 12:19So as it just pause and check in,
  • 12:21here underrepresented is a term that I
  • 12:23will be using for the remainder of the talk,
  • 12:26which means those racial and ethnic
  • 12:27populations that are that are
  • 12:29underrepresented in the medical
  • 12:30profession relative to the numbers
  • 12:32in the general population and this
  • 12:33represents a shift from the 2003
  • 12:36term underrepresented minority which
  • 12:39classically consists of blacks,
  • 12:42individual black individuals
  • 12:44on Mexican Americans,
  • 12:46Native Americans mainland Puerto Ricans.
  • 12:49And for those individuals we would use
  • 12:52the term underrepresented minority.
  • 12:53However,
  • 12:54the AMC decided to shift and use
  • 12:56the term underrepresented medicine
  • 12:57because the old term underrepresented
  • 13:00minority represents affixed,
  • 13:01affixed aggregation of individuals where you,
  • 13:03as UIM allows for an evolution of
  • 13:06the individuals that we are looking
  • 13:08at relative to their population
  • 13:09within the United States and so the
  • 13:11expectation or the hope is that at
  • 13:13some point black individuals will
  • 13:15no longer be underrepresented in
  • 13:16medicine relative to the proportion
  • 13:18of the United States population.
  • 13:20And therefore we can shift the focus
  • 13:23more appropriately to other individuals.
  • 13:26OK,
  • 13:26now again I just said I will be using you.
  • 13:28I am for the remainder of the talk,
  • 13:30but a lot of these data are coming
  • 13:31are are are a little bit older
  • 13:33and so they are priest.
  • 13:35They they predate the ships to you.
  • 13:36I am so URM will be synonymous
  • 13:39and for these slides,
  • 13:41but what I'd like to highlight is
  • 13:42that when we look at when we look
  • 13:44at the very beginning of the path,
  • 13:46we're not the very beginning when
  • 13:47we look at the middle of the pathway
  • 13:48into a career in medicine with the
  • 13:50beginning of the pathway starting
  • 13:51and you know my sons pointed in
  • 13:53kindergarten when we look at the
  • 13:54midpoint in terms of applications.
  • 13:56In medical school we do see that
  • 13:58there have been slight increases
  • 13:59in the number of applications the
  • 14:01medical school over the past.
  • 14:02I'd say since the past 2000s we can
  • 14:04see that that there is an uptick.
  • 14:06However,
  • 14:07we need to be very deliberate in
  • 14:09how we look at these data because
  • 14:12applications are not the only.
  • 14:13Point here, right?
  • 14:14We want to look at how many students
  • 14:16are matriculate ING successfully,
  • 14:18and then how many are actually graduating
  • 14:21applications are not sufficient,
  • 14:23and they don't represent the
  • 14:25entirety of the situation.
  • 14:27So we look at individuals that
  • 14:29are identified at self identify
  • 14:31as black or African American.
  • 14:33When we look at the number of
  • 14:35applicants versus acceptes
  • 14:36again, you see that upward trend
  • 14:38in the number of applications.
  • 14:39But when you look at the number of acceptes
  • 14:42that has remained fairly stagnant and
  • 14:44then it's important take home point,
  • 14:46there is something going on here.
  • 14:47Whether there are barriers to their
  • 14:49acceptances or they're just not being
  • 14:51accepted at increasing rates commensurate
  • 14:53with the number of applications.
  • 14:55Same similar trends seen
  • 14:56in our Hispanic or Latino.
  • 14:58Populations or Latin X populations.
  • 15:00You see that there is an uptick
  • 15:01in the number of applicants,
  • 15:02but not the same rate of increase
  • 15:05in the number of acceptance
  • 15:07applicants versus acceptance.
  • 15:10This deposit check in here are
  • 15:11American Indian or Alaskan
  • 15:13native or Indigenous American.
  • 15:14Population has remained abysmally low
  • 15:16in terms of the number of applicants
  • 15:19versus acceptes and this is often
  • 15:21the unspoken aspect of diversity.
  • 15:24When we think about our Native American
  • 15:26indigenous American population,
  • 15:27profound under representation.
  • 15:29Despite significant disparities in
  • 15:31health and health care delivery.
  • 15:34OK,
  • 15:35so we talked about the midpoint in
  • 15:37the pathway into query medicine,
  • 15:39which is the application to medical school.
  • 15:41We talked about that even though
  • 15:42the numbers of applicants that are
  • 15:44under record that self identify
  • 15:46as underrepresented in medicine
  • 15:47or underrepresented minority have
  • 15:49increased the number of acceptes
  • 15:51has remained stagnant.
  • 15:52What we also see is that there
  • 15:55is declining representation,
  • 15:57so we have the US Census population
  • 15:59which serves as our benchmark
  • 16:01that is our representation in the
  • 16:03total US population will meet.
  • 16:05Look at the various milestones we
  • 16:07look at the medical school graduates
  • 16:09and then we look at the total GME
  • 16:11pool and we look at the total
  • 16:13physician pool we see attrition or
  • 16:15loss of these individuals on the
  • 16:18pathway to a career as a physician,
  • 16:20and again highlighting reiterating
  • 16:21the thing that we saw with the
  • 16:23acceptance versus acceptance.
  • 16:24There's attrition there,
  • 16:25so at every node or every milestone
  • 16:27in this pathway, there is attrition.
  • 16:29There's attrition from application to
  • 16:31acceptance, acceptance to matriculation,
  • 16:33which circulation to graduation.
  • 16:35Graduation to residency residency
  • 16:37to practicing physician.
  • 16:41And. This trend continues so under
  • 16:45representation increases at faculty ranks.
  • 16:48So when you look at Mewis Medical
  • 16:50school graduates and compare their
  • 16:52numbers with full time US Medical
  • 16:54school faculty again you see that
  • 16:57attrition with declining representation
  • 16:59down to about 3.5 three point 5% for
  • 17:03black representation at faculty ranks,
  • 17:06and three point 2% for Hispanic or Latino.
  • 17:11But what an interesting trend here.
  • 17:13However, though,
  • 17:14is that these gender disparities that we
  • 17:16all talk about gender disparities and
  • 17:19feet and in female representation and
  • 17:21hire faculty ranks and leadership roles.
  • 17:23Those gender disparities persist independent
  • 17:25of a self identified race Recognice city.
  • 17:29So even though there are more female African
  • 17:32American or black self identified physicians,
  • 17:36there are more male,
  • 17:37self identified black or African American
  • 17:40faculty and leadership positions.
  • 17:42Including department chairs and
  • 17:44which is what we're looking at here.
  • 17:47Same thing resonates true for Hispanic.
  • 17:51And stepping outside of,
  • 17:53you know the the MD pathway.
  • 17:56Do these trends hold true for our
  • 17:58PhD colleagues?
  • 17:59And they do so when we look at
  • 18:01data from the NIH,
  • 18:02we see that there again is
  • 18:04at trend of attrition.
  • 18:05When you look at let's look at women,
  • 18:07you look at women the there's
  • 18:09attrition from associates to bachelors,
  • 18:11bachelors, Masters, Masters,
  • 18:13electoral etc etc.
  • 18:14When you look at underrepresented again,
  • 18:17there's attrition down to full professor.
  • 18:20So these.
  • 18:21These trends resonate and or these
  • 18:24trends are persistent through not only
  • 18:27the MD pathway but also PhD pathway.
  • 18:31And I'd like to highlight something
  • 18:33that was published by Ginther at all,
  • 18:35where they noted that after controlling
  • 18:37for applicant educational background,
  • 18:39country of origin training,
  • 18:40prior research experience,
  • 18:42publication record,
  • 18:43employer characteristics,
  • 18:44they found that black were African
  • 18:47American self identified faculty remain
  • 18:50less likely than white than white
  • 18:53individuals to be awarded NIH funding,
  • 18:55which again represents a significant barrier,
  • 18:57particularly for our PhD colleagues
  • 18:59and their.
  • 19:00Not only a fat successful
  • 19:02faculty appointment,
  • 19:03but then also successful untimely
  • 19:05promotion from assistant to
  • 19:07associate associate full professor.
  • 19:09This is also somewhat true for MD's,
  • 19:12but may not be necessarily as
  • 19:14critical to successful promotion.
  • 19:16To just highlighting that there are
  • 19:19barriers to successful promotion for
  • 19:21not only individuals underrepresented
  • 19:23but also individuals that I self
  • 19:26identify as female and these hold
  • 19:28true not only for MD but also PhD.
  • 19:31Pathways and I'm talking a lot
  • 19:34about race and ethnicity,
  • 19:36since that is the area that
  • 19:37I am the most familiar with.
  • 19:39However,
  • 19:39I do want to pause again and
  • 19:41check in and remind everyone that
  • 19:43diversity is very diverse when we
  • 19:45look at socioeconomic diversity,
  • 19:47for example,
  • 19:48there is significant and profound
  • 19:51underrepresentation of individuals
  • 19:53that have parents that have the that
  • 19:56have income within the lowest quintile.
  • 19:59Less than you know,
  • 20:01less than 5% of our US medical students have.
  • 20:03Parental incomes within the lowest quintile.
  • 20:07But then when you look at the
  • 20:09top 50% of the of the students,
  • 20:11their parents have the top 5th
  • 20:14and 80th to 95th
  • 20:16percentile. Income just highlighting profound
  • 20:19disparities in socioeconomic status using
  • 20:21parental income as a surrogate marker,
  • 20:24and this has remained relatively stagnant,
  • 20:26and these socioeconomic barriers have been
  • 20:29demonstrated to correlate with performance
  • 20:31and success within medical school with
  • 20:34students that come from that have parents
  • 20:37that have again low socioeconomic
  • 20:39income or socio economic status,
  • 20:41those students are more likely to attrite
  • 20:44within the first first, second, first,
  • 20:46or second years of medical school.
  • 20:48Independent of their emcat scores,
  • 20:51so again, socioeconomic status impacts.
  • 20:55Diversity and has an impact on the
  • 20:58barriers that the students will face.
  • 21:01So why don't we look at some pathology
  • 21:04specific data that we looked at some broader
  • 21:06overall trends and medical education,
  • 21:08and we look at pathology and I again I I
  • 21:12want to just remind everyone that these
  • 21:14are all data that are obtained from AMC
  • 21:17and historically AMC data collection
  • 21:19methods have been somewhat reductive
  • 21:21and exclusive of of of individuals.
  • 21:24So for the up until recently I think is 2017.
  • 21:29You could either identify as black
  • 21:31or African American.
  • 21:31However,
  • 21:32there is incredible diversity
  • 21:33within African diaspora.
  • 21:35Same thing is true for Hispanic and
  • 21:37then for for gender identity you
  • 21:39can either self identify as female
  • 21:41or male and that's it.
  • 21:43So again a lot of these data.
  • 21:44I apologize,
  • 21:45I'm not using the correct the
  • 21:47the most inclusive terminology,
  • 21:49but these are the way that data have
  • 21:51been presented and hopefully moving
  • 21:52forward now that there are more,
  • 21:53there's more inclusion in our
  • 21:55data collection methods.
  • 21:56We will we'll be able to present our
  • 21:58data or the data in a more inclusive way.
  • 22:01Well, let's look at.
  • 22:02Look at some pathology specific data and
  • 22:04my interest in this was sparked by a.
  • 22:07Paper published by one of my
  • 22:09colleagues here in radiation Oncology
  • 22:10at Hopkins Cortlandville,
  • 22:12who published that in 2012.
  • 22:15GME trainee or pathology GME
  • 22:18trainees were there are fewer black
  • 22:22pathology trainees 11 compared
  • 22:23to the overall Jamie Pool,
  • 22:26and that's also in comparison to for example.
  • 22:30Physical medicine and rehabilitation.
  • 22:32Emergency medicine.
  • 22:33Radiation oncology.
  • 22:33So at that time we had worked
  • 22:36we had lower representation of
  • 22:38black students or black rice.
  • 22:40I'm sorry black residents at
  • 22:42that time in 2012 when compared
  • 22:44to other medical specialties.
  • 22:46Hispanics were also less represented,
  • 22:49however that was not
  • 22:50statistically significant,
  • 22:51so I became interested in
  • 22:53kind of looking at longer,
  • 22:54longer trend,
  • 22:55longer term themes and trends in
  • 22:58terms of representation,
  • 23:00and to and look more forward and
  • 23:02see how the trends improve or
  • 23:04if there is improvement.
  • 23:06And So what I noted first was
  • 23:08that pathology is a female,
  • 23:10is a leader for female resident
  • 23:12and fellow representation compared
  • 23:13to other medical specialties,
  • 23:14and that certainly is no secret.
  • 23:16We in pathology reached near gender
  • 23:18parity in the in the early 2000s,
  • 23:20and that has been a sustained increase
  • 23:22in female representation since then,
  • 23:25and so it's we've made significant strides.
  • 23:27So what it highlights is that
  • 23:29we as a specialty
  • 23:30or are are capable of doing it.
  • 23:32We increase female representation
  • 23:34and that increased female
  • 23:35representation has been sustained.
  • 23:37And so it's portant for us to keep that
  • 23:39in mind when we think about how high the
  • 23:41hurdle and amusing hurdle as an analogy.
  • 23:43Since I was a hurdler in college,
  • 23:44what we use, you know that that
  • 23:46there is a high hurdle to overcome,
  • 23:48but we can do it because we did
  • 23:50it for female representation.
  • 23:52With that in mind,
  • 23:54there are still significant barriers to
  • 23:56increasing female representation by fat
  • 23:59***** particularly in faculty ranks,
  • 24:01with which we note that about 39.56%
  • 24:05of female faculty or faculty or female.
  • 24:07So there are still some significant
  • 24:10opportunities for improvement.
  • 24:12But again, there is still sustained increase,
  • 24:15and so we are on the right pathway forward.
  • 24:20And when we look at the 2020 seventeen
  • 24:22distribution of female sex by female sex
  • 24:25Ben pathology compared to the US population,
  • 24:28again, we are doing fantastic with
  • 24:30our pathology residents almost at
  • 24:32the same level of their female
  • 24:35representation in the US Census.
  • 24:37However, again are practicing
  • 24:38pathologists is a little bit lower than
  • 24:40female representation in US Census,
  • 24:42so opportunities for improvement. But again,
  • 24:44we're on the right pathway forward.
  • 24:46So again, it highlights that we can do it.
  • 24:49With that in mind,
  • 24:50but there are some significant
  • 24:51opportunities for us to do it.
  • 24:52We have to increase racial and
  • 24:55ethnic diversity in pathology.
  • 24:57When we look at the distribution
  • 24:58of pathology residents by race and
  • 25:00ethnicity between 1995 and 2017,
  • 25:02at that point in time 8% were Hispanic,
  • 25:064.5% were black and point 1% were
  • 25:10Indigenous American, American,
  • 25:11American Indian, Native American,
  • 25:15Pacific Islander.
  • 25:17These have increased only slightly
  • 25:19in pathology.
  • 25:20For Hispanic, we're a little bit above eight,
  • 25:238% were around 5% for black and.
  • 25:27About the same for American
  • 25:30Indian indigenous American.
  • 25:31Why is this matter? Again,
  • 25:33US census populations here in the top bar.
  • 25:36Hispanic and yellow,
  • 25:37black and blue.
  • 25:39And and just Americans in in black.
  • 25:43And we know again there is significant
  • 25:47underrepresentation comparatively speaking,
  • 25:48when we look at the number of faculty.
  • 25:50We're at 5.2%,
  • 25:51two point 2% and .2% respectively.
  • 25:55So significant under representation.
  • 25:58And when we look at longitudinal trends,
  • 26:00there are none.
  • 26:01The rate of increase in representation
  • 26:04for black faculty and Native American
  • 26:06faculty has not been increasing at a
  • 26:09significant rate. Again, abysmally low.
  • 26:12So there are significant opportunities,
  • 26:15and there's no secret that when
  • 26:16we look even at pathology,
  • 26:18chair and leadership positions again,
  • 26:21these disparities persist again with
  • 26:23the gender diverse gender disparities
  • 26:26persisting as well with data from AMC High.
  • 26:29Highlighting that of our pathology
  • 26:33department's 38% of our clinical
  • 26:35pathology departments or pathology
  • 26:36clinical departments have female chairs.
  • 26:3833% of our basic science pathology
  • 26:41apartments have female chairs.
  • 26:42There are two female, one male,
  • 26:45black or African American chill chair.
  • 26:47Three female,
  • 26:482 male Hispanic or Latin X or Latino
  • 26:51no American Indian Alaska native oh
  • 26:54ornate Hawaiian so again highlighting
  • 26:57the overall trend of attrition.
  • 26:59There's loss on this pathway into
  • 27:02medicine and I just want to pause
  • 27:04here again and think about the
  • 27:06terms that we often use.
  • 27:07We often say the pipeline and,
  • 27:09and when we think about being
  • 27:11in the space of the eye,
  • 27:13we want to be more Cognizant that
  • 27:15we always have room for improvement
  • 27:16and this is an area where I was.
  • 27:19Educated historically,
  • 27:19I had been using the term pipeline
  • 27:22and one of my, you know,
  • 27:24in my studies I recognize and learned
  • 27:26that pipeline is an inherently
  • 27:28is inherently triggering term.
  • 27:30For some individuals who identify
  • 27:32as indigenous American with the
  • 27:34with the with the connotation
  • 27:36or correlation with the the oil
  • 27:38pipelines in the in the Midwest,
  • 27:40and then thinking about to
  • 27:41our the black experience in
  • 27:43America, they call it. You know,
  • 27:44the pipeline into jail. So wanna be.
  • 27:47I'm trying to be more inclusive there
  • 27:48and and avoid using that terminology.
  • 27:50I've been trying to involve
  • 27:51myself and use a term pathway,
  • 27:53but we are seeing attrition on
  • 27:55this pathway into medicine and we
  • 27:57want to be mindful of what that
  • 27:58pathway into medicine may look like.
  • 28:00You know, thinking about our
  • 28:02colleagues and you know,
  • 28:03those individuals that you work with.
  • 28:04Some of them may have and assume you know
  • 28:06may may have earned an associates degree.
  • 28:08First took some time off,
  • 28:10went back out of four year degree
  • 28:11and then took some time off
  • 28:12again and then came back to you.
  • 28:14Know medicine now thinking about
  • 28:16what that individual needs compared
  • 28:18to a a student that goes straight
  • 28:20from high school to medical school.
  • 28:22Or high school to college to
  • 28:23medical school residency.
  • 28:24Their needs are distinctly different and
  • 28:27unique and being inclusive of each person,
  • 28:29lived experiences and what
  • 28:31career supports or what personal
  • 28:34support they need for them.
  • 28:36So I'm going to share some of what I've
  • 28:39learned in some of what we've learned
  • 28:40here at Hopkins and our efforts to
  • 28:43improve inclusion and equity in pathology.
  • 28:46And we'll start with our rotation for
  • 28:48students underrepresented in medicine
  • 28:50and from disadvantaged backgrounds,
  • 28:51and pre COVID.
  • 28:52This was a one month rotation
  • 28:54for students who self identify
  • 28:56as underrepresented in medicine
  • 28:57and at the time we were covering,
  • 28:59housing and travel for students
  • 29:01which rounded out to approximately
  • 29:04$1500 excluding travel,
  • 29:05which includes housing and then school of.
  • 29:08Medicine registration fees and I'm
  • 29:10highlighting this because these are,
  • 29:11you know pre COVID.
  • 29:12We thought a lot of we put a lot
  • 29:15of weight into those, you know,
  • 29:16external rotators, right?
  • 29:17Like oh,
  • 29:17this person did a rotation with
  • 29:18us and they were pantastic,
  • 29:20but we often didn't think about how and
  • 29:22how inequitable of an experience that is.
  • 29:24The students have to have the
  • 29:26money to spend to stay in a certain
  • 29:29location for an entire month.
  • 29:31Essentially pay double rent,
  • 29:33and then travel and pay registration fees.
  • 29:35If you are a student,
  • 29:36that is a perhaps, you know,
  • 29:37first generation college graduate.
  • 29:39Or a student that comes from a socio
  • 29:43economically disadvantaged background.
  • 29:44You know those experiences are
  • 29:47exceedingly difficult to navigate
  • 29:49because they are expensive,
  • 29:50and so for us,
  • 29:52that was why providing cover
  • 29:54financial support is important.
  • 29:57And in terms of increasing equity and access,
  • 30:00we also aim to increase equity by tailoring
  • 30:03the experience to the students and and,
  • 30:05you know,
  • 30:06checking in with them and finding out
  • 30:07what are they actually interested in,
  • 30:08not giving them the same
  • 30:10cookie cutter rotation,
  • 30:11because again,
  • 30:12each student has different interests
  • 30:14has different needs.
  • 30:15We also provided one on one advising
  • 30:17and mentoring with pathology,
  • 30:18junior and senior faculty had the
  • 30:20Met meet with our residency training
  • 30:22program director and the director
  • 30:23of Department of Pathology and then
  • 30:25finally we have exit interviews
  • 30:27to discuss
  • 30:28their experiences and.
  • 30:29And help us self reflect and process improve.
  • 30:33And this is our team and I
  • 30:35want to highlight that again,
  • 30:36none of these efforts can be
  • 30:38done in a silo by one person.
  • 30:39It really does require a team effort and
  • 30:42so here we have lisandra voltaggio myself,
  • 30:46Ralph Ruben, Lara Weiquan,
  • 30:47Junko Solonika, Wind and Sherry Reid.
  • 30:50She's our administrator support.
  • 30:51Who is fantastic.
  • 30:52Trisha Murdock and Alicia,
  • 30:53where again a team effort.
  • 30:57So we had this rotation.
  • 30:59It was established in 2013,
  • 31:01but I didn't become actively involved
  • 31:03with it in about until about 2016
  • 31:05and my involvement was somewhat
  • 31:07serendipitous because I graduated
  • 31:09from moral High School of Medicine
  • 31:10and Morehouse School Medicine has a
  • 31:12pathology department that is fantastic,
  • 31:14but they don't have any clinical
  • 31:16services and so when I came
  • 31:18to Hopkins for as a resident,
  • 31:20I was really interested in just
  • 31:21giving back to my alma mater and in
  • 31:24speaking with Ralph, he said, well,
  • 31:25oh, why don't you do an outreach?
  • 31:27Presentation and we found that
  • 31:28those out the outreach presentation
  • 31:30resulted in students being more
  • 31:32interested in rotating and so we
  • 31:34developed an outreach and active
  • 31:36outreach program targeting programs
  • 31:38at either our historically black
  • 31:40colleges or targeting specific
  • 31:42affinity groups at non historically
  • 31:45black universities and using
  • 31:47those as opportunities to have one
  • 31:49highlight pathology as a specialty.
  • 31:51Because we need students to
  • 31:54go in pathology and then two.
  • 31:56Talk to him a little about what our
  • 31:58rotation looks like and hopefully
  • 32:00generate some interest in our experience.
  • 32:02And so we did.
  • 32:04Active outreach and we again went in with it.
  • 32:07Went into these experiences trying
  • 32:09to reach as many students as
  • 32:11possible in the hopes that maybe
  • 32:13we would get one student rotator,
  • 32:15but again,
  • 32:16it just highlighted pathology as a specialty
  • 32:18to them and we even had students that said,
  • 32:21you know,
  • 32:21I quite frankly have no
  • 32:22interest in pathology,
  • 32:23but I want to go into OB GYN and I want
  • 32:25to learn more about pathology and we
  • 32:27have them rotate and that's totally fine.
  • 32:29So what we do is we have the we give
  • 32:31an overview of what pathologists do,
  • 32:33so this is Alicia.
  • 32:35We're giving a presentation on how our
  • 32:37pathologists involved in this case,
  • 32:38so we give the students a presentation.
  • 32:41The presentation or case presentation
  • 32:43in this in this talk was a
  • 32:45real modular carcinoma,
  • 32:46which hopefully most of the medical
  • 32:48students as they prepare for step one
  • 32:50would be familiar with and we show
  • 32:51them some gross photos that that's
  • 32:53myself and more hustle of medicine,
  • 32:55pre renovations and then walk
  • 32:56them through the case and talk
  • 32:57about the different ways that
  • 32:59pathologists were involved.
  • 33:00Talk about not only the
  • 33:02gross the frozen sections,
  • 33:03but gross examination.
  • 33:05Sign out with staging and diagnosis.
  • 33:08Diagnosis of an occult hemoglobin.
  • 33:11SC disease that clinically
  • 33:13had been a cultured,
  • 33:14not the clinicians had known about it.
  • 33:16We talked about the clinical
  • 33:18pathology and how the you
  • 33:19know they had a type and screen before by
  • 33:21the blood bank and how pathologists are
  • 33:24medical direct medical laboratory directors.
  • 33:26So again, talking with the
  • 33:28different ways that pathologists
  • 33:29are involved with patient care.
  • 33:30So they hopefully walk out
  • 33:32of these presentations,
  • 33:33learning that pathologists are not just,
  • 33:35you know in the doing autopsies which you
  • 33:38know is a very important part of pathology,
  • 33:41but you know we don't all
  • 33:42do pathology autopsies.
  • 33:43If that's certainly not
  • 33:45your area of interest,
  • 33:46but we also kind of reached back earlier,
  • 33:49because, again,
  • 33:50if you try if you start your
  • 33:52outreach efforts that medical school,
  • 33:55you're not going to reach as
  • 33:56many students as possible.
  • 33:57You thinking about the pipe
  • 33:59or the pathway into medicine.
  • 34:01There is significant attrition
  • 34:02once you hit medical school,
  • 34:04but there there is even greater
  • 34:06loss before that.
  • 34:08Think about when you started as
  • 34:09an undergraduate and how many
  • 34:11colleagues you had in your first
  • 34:13biology class and how many students
  • 34:14in your class at their pre Med and
  • 34:17then by the time you graduated,
  • 34:18at least in my experience,
  • 34:19you know it dropped.
  • 34:20It dropped down, you know, precipitously.
  • 34:22You know once you hit that,
  • 34:24you know or inorganic chemistry,
  • 34:26organic chemistry class.
  • 34:27How many students you know switch to
  • 34:29a different major or decided that
  • 34:30they no longer want to be pre Med.
  • 34:32So what we did is we started
  • 34:35reaching out earlier.
  • 34:36I mentioned Doctor Trisha Murdock.
  • 34:39She's Tuscarora Native American,
  • 34:40and she has been a very fierce
  • 34:43advocate for increasing representation
  • 34:45for our indigenous Americans.
  • 34:47And So what she did is looked.
  • 34:49Hooked us up with the National
  • 34:51Labor American Youth Initiative,
  • 34:53which provides a summer intensive
  • 34:55experience for students who self
  • 34:58identify as Indigenous American.
  • 35:00And what we did here is we
  • 35:03brought some microscopes.
  • 35:04Ralph Ruben packed him up in this
  • 35:06car and drove them down to DC for us.
  • 35:08And then we brought some plastinated
  • 35:10or some some nherf lungs and then
  • 35:13some formalin fixed specimens.
  • 35:15But you know,
  • 35:15we want to be mindful again of inclusion
  • 35:17and thinking about the indigenous
  • 35:19American experience and culture and values.
  • 35:21Some indigenous Americans have
  • 35:23concerns about touching tissues
  • 35:25from decedent individuals,
  • 35:27and so we were very explicit and told him,
  • 35:30you know,
  • 35:30these are tissues over here at the station.
  • 35:32Do not come to the station.
  • 35:34You know, you know we will
  • 35:36offer you another experience.
  • 35:37So again,
  • 35:37Trisha,
  • 35:38Trisha Murdock was instrumental
  • 35:39in helping us provide an inclusive
  • 35:41experience for those students.
  • 35:43But then also increasing acts,
  • 35:45increasing their access and
  • 35:46their high school students.
  • 35:47A lot of them just had questions
  • 35:49about college, but again,
  • 35:50just having those conversations with
  • 35:51them and having them speak to you know,
  • 35:53Trisha someone who had this similar
  • 35:55experience growing up in a reservation
  • 35:57and learning more about what you know,
  • 35:59her pathway looked like so that
  • 36:01they can see that it's possible.
  • 36:04This summer we are fortunate in
  • 36:06able to reset restart our active
  • 36:08outreach with our local high school
  • 36:11program and this is our summer
  • 36:13program at Dunbar High School
  • 36:15which is down the street from us.
  • 36:17For some of you basketball fans,
  • 36:19there are a couple of basketball
  • 36:21players that are pretty famous
  • 36:22from Dunbar High School,
  • 36:23but we worked with them over the
  • 36:25summer and again did the same
  • 36:26thing where we bought the specimens
  • 36:28in the bags and the nerve lungs
  • 36:30and the microscopes and had them
  • 36:31look at it and it was super cute.
  • 36:33Because if you can see in in here,
  • 36:35this student has herself one out,
  • 36:36not because they're checking their phone,
  • 36:38but because they were actually
  • 36:39taking a picture like our residents
  • 36:41doing like we do using their cell
  • 36:42phones to their oculars and they
  • 36:44figured this out all on their own.
  • 36:45So really bright students.
  • 36:47They're super interested and again,
  • 36:49we just talked a lot about just college,
  • 36:52and that's that's where they are
  • 36:53at that point in their career.
  • 36:54But just highlighting that,
  • 36:56you know this is you can do it.
  • 36:58These are the steps that you
  • 36:59need to take and we also brought
  • 37:01not only pathologist here,
  • 37:02you can see my colleague Laura Wake,
  • 37:03but then we also brought.
  • 37:05Our Histology Histology lab lead.
  • 37:09Yolanda Mitchell.
  • 37:11And we talked to them who talked
  • 37:12to the students about careers in
  • 37:14laboratory medicine and gave them
  • 37:15some more information about different,
  • 37:17you know,
  • 37:17a different way that you can
  • 37:19get a career in pathology,
  • 37:20and you don't necessarily have to
  • 37:21be a physician to be in pathology.
  • 37:23You can have a very fulfilling career
  • 37:25as a lead laboratory technician and the
  • 37:27different ways that you can get there.
  • 37:30Alright, so.
  • 37:30We focus a lot of our efforts on either,
  • 37:34again, historically black medical
  • 37:36schools or affinity groups or high schools,
  • 37:39or undergraduate programs
  • 37:40that have a greater,
  • 37:41have greater representation,
  • 37:43or of students underrepresented in medicine.
  • 37:45And why do we do that?
  • 37:46Because we want to reach as many
  • 37:48students as possible at one moment,
  • 37:49and this just highlights the point.
  • 37:51So these are data again,
  • 37:52from the AMA masterfile from AMC
  • 37:54and I highlights the number of
  • 37:56medical schools that graduated 300
  • 37:58and 5050 or more black or American
  • 38:01physicians between 1980 and 2012.
  • 38:03And you can see Howard,
  • 38:04Meharry and Morehouse are up there,
  • 38:07and again,
  • 38:08I'm noting Morehouse because Morehouse
  • 38:10wasn't open until about the late 1970s,
  • 38:13early 1980s.
  • 38:14But yet it got in my time when I graduated,
  • 38:18my class was around the size of 50,
  • 38:20such as schools,
  • 38:21to show you that, might you know,
  • 38:23at the time,
  • 38:24Tiny Morehouse School of Medicine had
  • 38:26graduated more than some other medical
  • 38:29schools that are notably missing here.
  • 38:32Find included.
  • 38:33Alright,
  • 38:34so US medical student interest you
  • 38:37know we talking a lot about reaching
  • 38:39as many students as possible.
  • 38:40When I reach as many UIM
  • 38:43students as possible too.
  • 38:44Create the most opportunities
  • 38:46for capturing one student,
  • 38:47but again pathology interest is declining.
  • 38:50We all know that and so why not reach as
  • 38:53many UIM students as possible just to
  • 38:55generate greater interest in pathology?
  • 38:57And so again, that's part of the
  • 38:59reason why we try to go for as
  • 39:01broad an audience as possible.
  • 39:02So when we go back to Morehouse or
  • 39:03when we speak with students at Meharry,
  • 39:05we we try and talk to the whole
  • 39:07class and not just, you know,
  • 39:08the students that self identify
  • 39:10as being interested in pathology
  • 39:11because that may be one person we
  • 39:13want to again generate as much
  • 39:15interest and enthusiasm about.
  • 39:16Our careers and pathology.
  • 39:18And these are just prior data
  • 39:21highlighting that on again US pathology.
  • 39:24Allopathic senior interest
  • 39:26is again declining,
  • 39:27precipitously relative to all
  • 39:29US senior interests and matching
  • 39:32into careers in medicine in US.
  • 39:35So what is the impact been out
  • 39:36of all of this?
  • 39:38So with once we initiate the active outreach,
  • 39:40we noted a dramatic increase
  • 39:42in rotation interest,
  • 39:44so again,
  • 39:45I mentioned that this experience
  • 39:48was established in 2013.
  • 39:50I mean at 1 rotator and then when
  • 39:52I became involved,
  • 39:53the number of rotators between
  • 39:552016 and 2019 was 20 and today
  • 39:59we've had a total of 26 rotators,
  • 40:01some of whom have been virtual
  • 40:04out of these rotators,
  • 40:069 have been have matched into pathology.
  • 40:10We have a few more that are matching that
  • 40:12are applying for the match this year or next,
  • 40:15and we're hopeful that they will
  • 40:17match into pathology as well.
  • 40:19To the former,
  • 40:20rotators have either completed.
  • 40:21Path, Jimmy or you me training at Hopkins.
  • 40:25I'm sorry Pat Jamie,
  • 40:26either residency or fellowship
  • 40:28education or training at Hopkins,
  • 40:30and so we're really proud,
  • 40:31but again,
  • 40:32we had some students that just flat
  • 40:34out said I'm going again into LBGYN
  • 40:36or or surgery or internal medicine.
  • 40:38I don't really have an interest
  • 40:40in and you know pathology,
  • 40:41but I want to,
  • 40:42you know,
  • 40:43do this experience around out my
  • 40:44experience and that's totally fine.
  • 40:46We were thrilled to have them with us.
  • 40:48Conversely,
  • 40:48we had one student come in that was
  • 40:50very passionate about a career in forensics.
  • 40:53And then came in and then decided
  • 40:56that pathology wasn't for them
  • 40:57and that was fantastic.
  • 40:58We were happy that we were able to
  • 41:00help that student figure out that
  • 41:03pathology was not the career for
  • 41:04them and they ended up becoming a or
  • 41:07matching into a vascular surgery program.
  • 41:09And now that student,
  • 41:11we're not that resident.
  • 41:12Physician seeks to give back to her
  • 41:15hometown by being a vascular surgeon and
  • 41:19provide care for Indigenous Americans.
  • 41:21Recognizing that there are profound.
  • 41:23Disparities and diabetes and
  • 41:26indigenous American populations,
  • 41:27so again having impacts even in
  • 41:29medical specialties is important,
  • 41:31so we're happy that we've had
  • 41:33an impact on these students.
  • 41:35Our careers and lives.
  • 41:37So that's the objective feedback.
  • 41:39The subjective feedback has been positive.
  • 41:42One of the best things that
  • 41:45we hope to achieve.
  • 41:46One of the things that we hope to
  • 41:47achieve with this whole experience is
  • 41:49not only introducing them to pathology,
  • 41:50but then also introducing them to
  • 41:52careers in academics and that.
  • 41:54Crews and academics can be very diverse and
  • 41:57don't necessarily need to be basic science,
  • 41:59and you need to have a lab and a
  • 42:01wet lab for example. So again that.
  • 42:05That feedback has, you know,
  • 42:07been fairly consistent and we're
  • 42:08happy that we're able to introduce the
  • 42:11students to what academics can look
  • 42:13like and that a career in academics
  • 42:15is not as unattainable as you know,
  • 42:17the the perception maybe.
  • 42:18And, and that certainly was my lived
  • 42:20experience where when I was, you know, I.
  • 42:22I certainly you know,
  • 42:2420 something year old me wouldn't
  • 42:25have imagined that I would have
  • 42:27ended up in academics,
  • 42:28and this is exactly why,
  • 42:30because I didn't think a career
  • 42:31in academics was accessible.
  • 42:32And I thought academics was one
  • 42:35career pathway.
  • 42:36But unfortunately during the pandemic again,
  • 42:39we had to think creatively.
  • 42:42So what we did is create a virtual
  • 42:44rotation for students underrepresented
  • 42:46in medicine and it started as a rotation
  • 42:50for our in-house internal Hopkins
  • 42:52students who at the time only had one
  • 42:54other rotation that was available to them.
  • 42:56Virtually that was clinical,
  • 42:57and that was radiology.
  • 42:59And so we developed a asynchronous and
  • 43:02synchronous work rotation that again
  • 43:04was all virtual using digital scan slides.
  • 43:07And the students were given again
  • 43:09previewing assignments and were expected
  • 43:11to render a complete diagnosis and
  • 43:13then email their diagnosis to me.
  • 43:16And then we would drive the
  • 43:17slides together during sign out,
  • 43:18and then I would have the students
  • 43:20present the cases to either myself
  • 43:22or my colleagues or other senior
  • 43:23residents as they would if they
  • 43:26were doing it in person experience.
  • 43:28And all that content was supplemented
  • 43:31by asynchronous independent content,
  • 43:34including online learning modules
  • 43:36and so with this experience created,
  • 43:39we were able to we recognize that we
  • 43:41were able to reach a broader number of
  • 43:43students and overcome the equity issue of,
  • 43:45you know that the the fees required
  • 43:47to travel for rotations,
  • 43:49and so we advocated to our School
  • 43:52of Medicine leadership to open this
  • 43:54experience up to UM students and
  • 43:57all students outside of Hopkins.
  • 43:59Recognizing that this election has
  • 44:01been an important element for us to
  • 44:04increase diversity and department.
  • 44:06So with that in mind,
  • 44:07we were able to get quite a few
  • 44:09rotators virtually and we were quite
  • 44:11proud that we were able to continue
  • 44:12to have impact in and increasing
  • 44:14our UM students experiences without
  • 44:17having them travel.
  • 44:20But that's the small picture, right?
  • 44:22Initiating department and institution wide
  • 44:25cultural change. That's the big picture.
  • 44:27That's that's that's the other part of this.
  • 44:30You can recruit, recruit,
  • 44:31recruit as much as you want.
  • 44:33But it means nothing if you haven't
  • 44:35created in a culture of inclusion,
  • 44:37a culture of equity within our department,
  • 44:40because the students are going to
  • 44:42come into your department and then
  • 44:44see that diversity inclusion are not
  • 44:45valued and they're going to walk right away.
  • 44:48Or, even worse,
  • 44:49you may.
  • 44:49They may walk away from medicine entirely.
  • 44:52If they feel that your department or your
  • 44:55or their experience was representative
  • 44:57of medicine at all as a whole,
  • 44:59and so that's really a key part
  • 45:01of this is how you initiate that
  • 45:03cultural change to make sure that the
  • 45:06environment that the students are coming
  • 45:08into the residents are coming into.
  • 45:10The faculty are coming into their
  • 45:11underrepresented in medicine.
  • 45:12The environments that they are
  • 45:14coming into our inclusive,
  • 45:15so they don't leave.
  • 45:17And I'd like to highlight what
  • 45:19Vanderbilt has done so Vanderbilt,
  • 45:21their radiology program builds a
  • 45:24diversity program at at a time
  • 45:27when they had no underrepresented
  • 45:29trainees in the residency program,
  • 45:31so they took us a tiered and
  • 45:34systematic approach to DEI to
  • 45:35look at the whole applicant pool,
  • 45:38their residency program proper,
  • 45:39and then they created
  • 45:41additional diversity program,
  • 45:42specific activities,
  • 45:43defined roles and responsibilities
  • 45:45for their office of of DEI.
  • 45:47Including personnel again,
  • 45:48a team based approach not doing this
  • 45:51in a silo and really dedicating the
  • 45:53funds and the time to doing this.
  • 45:56What they noted was that when they
  • 45:58took this tiered approach and were
  • 46:00I'm sorry my son is screaming it
  • 46:01took a tiered approach to deny that
  • 46:04the number of UAM trainees increased
  • 46:06from zero in 2013 to 6 and 2019.
  • 46:08So again being really deliberate
  • 46:10and so modeling after that,
  • 46:13Hopkins is again trying to foster
  • 46:15a true cultural shift and a true
  • 46:18culture of conclusion at at,
  • 46:19at and within the entire hospital,
  • 46:21but then also within our department.
  • 46:23So there are departmental and
  • 46:26institutional leadership structures so.
  • 46:28Within our department again,
  • 46:29I have myself who I advocated for a
  • 46:32deputy director ship for myself and
  • 46:34I we have a diversity committee.
  • 46:36It not only for our faculty and trainees,
  • 46:38but also for the staff and that is
  • 46:41a part of a broader institutional
  • 46:42DI structure which includes a
  • 46:44senior associate Dean for DIA,
  • 46:46Vice Vice President and Diversity
  • 46:49Officer or Chief Diversity Officer,
  • 46:51and then a vice Provost for DNI
  • 46:54at the broader university level.
  • 46:55We have DI specific activities.
  • 46:58And this picture here is our
  • 47:01house Staff Diversity Council.
  • 47:03We pre COVID we're having
  • 47:05what we're calling on.
  • 47:07I forgot what they're calling.
  • 47:08Network networking or activities and
  • 47:11we would have them every couple of
  • 47:13months and they'll be really informal.
  • 47:15We would have food and then
  • 47:17faculty and fellows.
  • 47:18Residents could all join and just
  • 47:21network and and and and and fellowship.
  • 47:25Since then, they've expanded to include.
  • 47:28Other groups,
  • 47:29including our ELG,
  • 47:30LGBTQI community and other
  • 47:34individuals as well,
  • 47:36and then again facilitating
  • 47:38that working in fellowship.
  • 47:39What else have we done?
  • 47:41So at Hopkins we are trying
  • 47:42to extend beyond implicit bias
  • 47:44training and normalizing and
  • 47:46expanding these conversations.
  • 47:47You know,
  • 47:48these conversations can always
  • 47:49feel a little uncomfortable,
  • 47:50but the more you have them
  • 47:52and the more robust they are,
  • 47:54the more comfortable they become and
  • 47:55the more comfortable you become with,
  • 47:57you know, educating each other.
  • 47:59Again, I was educated on using the
  • 48:01term pipeline and so you know I
  • 48:03I was comfortable in having that
  • 48:05conversation with a colleague.
  • 48:07And so, using intergroup dialogues,
  • 48:09open discussion listening session when
  • 48:11briefings, professional development,
  • 48:12programming, training, focus workshop.
  • 48:15So this morning I did a training
  • 48:16focus workshop with your residence
  • 48:17and they were fantastic.
  • 48:18I was really proud of the of the of
  • 48:20the content that they came up with and
  • 48:22then case and evidence based health
  • 48:24HealthEquity grand Rounds is another example.
  • 48:27What we did recently at Hopkins is
  • 48:29did a micro aggressions workshop
  • 48:31specific to pathology.
  • 48:33So we use pathology specific
  • 48:35cases for example.
  • 48:36So one of them was.
  • 48:37You know you're out,
  • 48:38sign out and you overhear someone
  • 48:40saying that the residents quality of
  • 48:42English is poor and you're disappointed.
  • 48:45Or something to that extent.
  • 48:46And what do you do?
  • 48:47As you observe that macro aggression?
  • 48:49That's not even a micro aggression
  • 48:51and the ways that you can
  • 48:53interrupt the microaggressions
  • 48:54triangle by either being by by,
  • 48:56you know, being a bystander end,
  • 48:58interrupting it.
  • 48:59If you're the source,
  • 49:00you know how you can assist.
  • 49:02Or if you're the recipient,
  • 49:03how you act upon it.
  • 49:04How do you self advocate?
  • 49:06And so we had that microaggressions workshop?
  • 49:08And again it was interactive,
  • 49:09so instead of it being one of
  • 49:11those online learning modules
  • 49:12or a video that you watched for
  • 49:1310 minutes and it ends up being
  • 49:15very interactive and a dialogue,
  • 49:16and you learn more from each other.
  • 49:19I'm just as you all are doing.
  • 49:21We have increased the number of DI
  • 49:23lectures and increase our speaker
  • 49:24diversity so we also had doctor
  • 49:26Andrew de Rep and Doctor Joseph
  • 49:28Graves give a grand rounds to us
  • 49:29and Doctor Lecia where I hope that
  • 49:32you will invite her for a future
  • 49:34grand rounds but she gave a really
  • 49:36nice grand rounds on a holistic
  • 49:38review and how we can utilize that.
  • 49:41What the different elements of
  • 49:42holistic review R and the data behind,
  • 49:44why they're important,
  • 49:46and we also instituted a health disparities.
  • 49:50Curriculum and mini curriculum,
  • 49:51which included health disparities and
  • 49:53pathologists overview by myself and
  • 49:55then looking at COVID-19 health disparities.
  • 49:57From a microbiology perspective,
  • 49:59doctor Hebel Mustafa gave a beautiful
  • 50:02overview of how she advocated for text
  • 50:04test access within the local Baltimore
  • 50:06community and then Doctor Mark Mars
  • 50:08Inky give a nice overview of health
  • 50:10disparities in laboratory medicine.
  • 50:12Touching on not only EGFR,
  • 50:13but then also our reference ranges for
  • 50:16for our transgender nonbinary patient
  • 50:19population or community around us.
  • 50:21We are providing more information
  • 50:23to our internal Chinese.
  • 50:25We have a dedicated path to EI website that
  • 50:27was made beautiful by our path web team.
  • 50:30I cannot even take credit for this
  • 50:33beautiful tile that RJ made but just
  • 50:36highlighting different resources
  • 50:37that are available and and then
  • 50:39just again using these different
  • 50:41platforms to highlight the ongoing
  • 50:43activities throughout the institution.
  • 50:45Not only our house at Diversity Council
  • 50:49but again grand rounds. Different events,
  • 50:51including a little our conference
  • 50:53series throughout the university,
  • 50:55but that's the small picture.
  • 50:57The big picture here and my son you know
  • 50:59at the time was two when we took him to
  • 51:01one of the museums at the Air and Space
  • 51:03Museum down here and and Northern Virginia.
  • 51:05And he totally didn't even see the
  • 51:07space shuttle in the room because he's.
  • 51:09He's like that all the space shuttle is
  • 51:10like that big and he just truly missed him.
  • 51:12So it was our what's what's the big
  • 51:14picture that we're missing here?
  • 51:15And our big picture here is national
  • 51:18organizational leadership investment.
  • 51:20And what does that look like?
  • 51:21That means accountability and our
  • 51:25national organizations holding
  • 51:27our institutions accountable.
  • 51:30So AMC is holding our institutions
  • 51:32accountable by implementing holistic
  • 51:34review and all these holistic review
  • 51:36materials are available for free on
  • 51:37their website and for those of you who
  • 51:39are unfamiliar with holistic review,
  • 51:41it's a mission, missions aligned
  • 51:43admissions or selection process.
  • 51:45It takes everything into consideration
  • 51:47about now about an applicant,
  • 51:48not only their academics or not
  • 51:50only their research experience.
  • 51:51But also.
  • 51:53The value that they would add their
  • 51:56lived experiences and diversity in
  • 51:58the way that individuals and and in
  • 52:00in individuals lived experiences.
  • 52:02Again,
  • 52:03lots of materials that are available
  • 52:06for free on AMC.
  • 52:08But going beyond that,
  • 52:09so for the department chair for for
  • 52:11department chairs and division directors,
  • 52:13you may be quite familiar with the
  • 52:15LC media accreditation process,
  • 52:17but the standards include diversity pipeline.
  • 52:20And again we want to be mindful
  • 52:21term pipeline,
  • 52:22but the way it's written right now,
  • 52:23it's pipeline programs and partnerships,
  • 52:26cultural competence and healthcare
  • 52:28disparities.
  • 52:28All of us that are in leadership
  • 52:30positions are being required to
  • 52:31now comment on what we are doing
  • 52:33to contribute to diversity.
  • 52:34So that's us being held accountable
  • 52:36by our national organizations.
  • 52:38Outside of pathology.
  • 52:40But we have to Belgium milestones
  • 52:42that touched on cultural competency
  • 52:44for the record.
  • 52:45And so these are things that we
  • 52:47should be teaching our medical,
  • 52:48our residents and we are.
  • 52:50We should be holding ourselves
  • 52:52accountable because they are milestones.
  • 52:54And if we are going to check off that,
  • 52:56you know,
  • 52:57for interpersonal communication skills,
  • 52:58one our our resident has reached Level 4,
  • 53:01we should at least check in and
  • 53:03make sure that they are able to
  • 53:05provide culturally competent care.
  • 53:06And how are we assessing that?
  • 53:09Moreover, on the annual survey,
  • 53:11there's an opportunity for you to
  • 53:13comment on for for the residents
  • 53:15to comment on whether or not they
  • 53:16are being educated in health
  • 53:18disparities so things are being
  • 53:20held by accountable by the AC GME,
  • 53:23it means holding each other
  • 53:25as colleagues accountable.
  • 53:26Some of you may be familiar with
  • 53:28this publication that looked at
  • 53:30representation in the cardiology workforce,
  • 53:33and there were some misinterpretations
  • 53:34of the data,
  • 53:35and UPMC was fantastic and highlighting that.
  • 53:39That there were opportunities to
  • 53:41reeducate or improve education of
  • 53:43the faculty members involved
  • 53:45with this publication.
  • 53:47So holding each other accountable
  • 53:49and then the journal editor
  • 53:51held themselves accountable.
  • 53:52Doctor Francis Collins is holding us
  • 53:55all accountable with ending the manual.
  • 53:58Hannah Valentine is making lots of
  • 54:00tools available so that we can.
  • 54:01We have access to them so we have no.
  • 54:03We no longer have an excuse to say
  • 54:05I don't know how to do this but
  • 54:07within pathology we're starting
  • 54:09to see greater representation in
  • 54:11our various publications and we
  • 54:13had asked published a really nice
  • 54:15DNI peace and at your conference
  • 54:17is both use CAP and a SCP and CAP.
  • 54:21We're seeing more.
  • 54:23Content focusing on DNI and equity as well,
  • 54:26so it's really important that our
  • 54:28professional society start to hold
  • 54:30us accountable by giving us the
  • 54:32educational content and resources
  • 54:33so we can take them back to
  • 54:35our respective institutions.
  • 54:38And and and our professional organization
  • 54:40should be leading by example here.
  • 54:43So in summary,
  • 54:44diversity in pathology is critical
  • 54:45as we all strive to innovate,
  • 54:47increase awareness self and
  • 54:48reduce health disparities.
  • 54:49Diversify clinical trials and
  • 54:51provide high quality care.
  • 54:53There are extensive opportunities to
  • 54:55retain female faculty at higher ranks,
  • 54:57so we're on our way.
  • 54:58But there's still more to do.
  • 55:00There are significant barriers
  • 55:02to recruiting and retaining
  • 55:03individuals under representing
  • 55:04underrepresented in medicine,
  • 55:06and those barriers evolve at each
  • 55:08stage in their education and careers.
  • 55:10Be really mindful and sensitive to that.
  • 55:12Then finally impactful DE&IDEI
  • 55:15initiatives should include
  • 55:16personalized outreach and mentoring,
  • 55:18but they should also be component of a
  • 55:20larger institution and or specialty.
  • 55:21Wide cultural changes.
  • 55:22And with that I'd like to
  • 55:24acknowledge again Doctor Lecia,
  • 55:26where my colleague she's been
  • 55:28fantastic and instrumental and our
  • 55:30work here realized in Kirtland Ville.
  • 55:33Also colleagues at Hopkins.
  • 55:35That helps put together the
  • 55:37data that we published.
  • 55:38Again our team at Hopkins and and
  • 55:41our pathology photography support
  • 55:42team for helping us put together
  • 55:44the nice little pamphlet that we
  • 55:46give to the residents or to the
  • 55:48medical students so we do outreach
  • 55:50initiatives and with that if only
  • 55:52everything was as easy as looking
  • 55:54at cars under the microscope.
  • 55:56And hopefully we're not missing
  • 55:57the big picture here,
  • 55:59which again is is inclusion.
  • 56:01So thank you for your time.
  • 56:03I think we're right at the hour and I
  • 56:04guess I'll hang on for any questions.
  • 56:10Thank you so much to Doctor White
  • 56:12for this excellent presentation.
  • 56:15The floor is open for
  • 56:16questions you can speak up.
  • 56:17You can write him in the chat.
  • 56:24To my son is screaming now. I'm sorry,
  • 56:26I'll just say congratulatory comment.
  • 56:30It's really impressive Marissa and I
  • 56:32was so pleased that you and I had a
  • 56:35moment to chat earlier in the day,
  • 56:37but your YOUR programs that get both
  • 56:41at diversity and in in younger people
  • 56:45and and and and also the the problem
  • 56:48we're having in recruiting a pathology.
  • 56:49Are really exemplary and gosh really
  • 56:52should be a model for all of us,
  • 56:55including us here at Yale.
  • 56:57So thank you for sharing that
  • 56:59great success story. Thank you.
  • 57:05So I this Dave Rim,
  • 57:07I would echo Maurice comments.
  • 57:09I think it was really terrific,
  • 57:10but I'm in the world we live in today.
  • 57:13Their audiences aren't so
  • 57:15receptive as perhaps the one here.
  • 57:17And do you have pointers for us as
  • 57:19we try to spread this word to how?
  • 57:22How you approach a non receptive audience?
  • 57:25Yes, I'll I'll. I'll give you an,
  • 57:27I'll share my experience soum.
  • 57:32Mike, so I talked about the
  • 57:34microaggressions workshop and
  • 57:35initially there is, you know,
  • 57:36push back and you know your conversation
  • 57:38about well microaggressions don't
  • 57:39really happen with us, right?
  • 57:41Because we're pathologist.
  • 57:43And then we said the microscope
  • 57:45and we're not really. We
  • 57:46look at our own shoes all the
  • 57:48time. Yeah, yeah, exactly.
  • 57:50Honestly, at some point
  • 57:52you just have to do it up,
  • 57:54and that's essentially what I did.
  • 57:57I said you know, Ralph,
  • 57:58you just need to do this and Mike,
  • 58:00we need to do this and. Thanks.
  • 58:04And I told him that we were having,
  • 58:05you know, we had the the the team
  • 58:08coming in and we did it and after the
  • 58:10fact you know really positive feedback.
  • 58:12So at some point.
  • 58:13When you recognize that there is
  • 58:16a significant opportunity for.
  • 58:18You know a conversation,
  • 58:20you just have to do it and they will all.
  • 58:23There will always no matter,
  • 58:24no matter what you do.
  • 58:25I think Marie you mentioned this
  • 58:26to me no matter what you do,
  • 58:28there will always be a dissenting
  • 58:30voice or voices in the crowd,
  • 58:32and that's fine.
  • 58:33But if you reach,
  • 58:34at least if you reach one person,
  • 58:37that's enough, right?
  • 58:38Because in this space you just
  • 58:41trying to build your your group,
  • 58:43your your team,
  • 58:44and as your team becomes larger
  • 58:46you will have more voices that
  • 58:48will all as a collective.
  • 58:49Groups say you know this should
  • 58:51be interrupted or we should
  • 58:53be focusing on this as well.
  • 58:55So again,
  • 58:56I I I think.
  • 58:58Building your team one person
  • 59:00at a time and at some point
  • 59:02you just have to just say it.
  • 59:05It is what it is.
  • 59:06We can't.
  • 59:07There are certain things that
  • 59:08should not be happening anymore,
  • 59:10and when they do happen they
  • 59:12need to stop and there needs to
  • 59:14be an opportunity for education.
  • 59:16It is what it is.
  • 59:21I have a quick question. Related
  • 59:24to what David asked you,
  • 59:26what do you think as you look back and
  • 59:28reflect on the experience so far with
  • 59:31one or two of the most major obstacles?
  • 59:35That you had to struggle with to
  • 59:37get over some of these things.
  • 59:39Was it financial? Was it other things?
  • 59:42I think the human capital is
  • 59:44the most challenging hurdle.
  • 59:46You know, building the team and I'm
  • 59:48happy to say that now there are a lot
  • 59:51more individuals that are involved
  • 59:52and and the lesson I learned is that
  • 59:55I should have reached out and cast a
  • 59:58broader net earlier because I think.
  • 01:00:00There were a lot more individuals
  • 01:00:03that were interested.
  • 01:00:04But they had no reservations or
  • 01:00:07were a little bit nervous about,
  • 01:00:10you know, putting themselves forward.
  • 01:00:12But if you actively seek out their support,
  • 01:00:14they happily support,
  • 01:00:15you know Mark Mars Inc has been
  • 01:00:17a fierce advocate,
  • 01:00:18and I I should have reached
  • 01:00:20out to him a long time ago,
  • 01:00:21so casting a broad net and and
  • 01:00:24building that team or sooner rather
  • 01:00:26than later is instrumental not only
  • 01:00:28to the success of the activities,
  • 01:00:30but then also their durability.
  • 01:00:31You want to make sure that you know these.
  • 01:00:34Initiatives don't fizzle away once they
  • 01:00:38start. They should not end with me.
  • 01:00:42Great thank you Lisa too.
  • 01:00:46I think the other challenge.
  • 01:00:50I'll think about it.
  • 01:00:51I'll think about the second thing.
  • 01:00:52I think building the team has been
  • 01:00:54has been the most important thing.
  • 01:00:55'cause you cannot do everything
  • 01:00:57by yourself. Understood.
  • 01:01:02Doctor Lu oh hi, you know thank
  • 01:01:06you for this very you know,
  • 01:01:08interesting seminar.
  • 01:01:09I think you know, as as a you know,
  • 01:01:13is really congratulate you for building
  • 01:01:15this team together at Hopkins.
  • 01:01:18You know you showed the data as well,
  • 01:01:21so it seems like the US senior, yeah.
  • 01:01:23I mean you are, you know US medical
  • 01:01:26Graduate School graduate graduation,
  • 01:01:28US medical school seniors.
  • 01:01:30They are generally
  • 01:01:31continued to have declining
  • 01:01:33interest in pathology. So as I'm
  • 01:01:36from your personal experience personal
  • 01:01:39study I know have you identified some
  • 01:01:42of the key factors you know,
  • 01:01:44you know, affect that interest,
  • 01:01:46affected that trend?
  • 01:01:48So that's one question.
  • 01:01:49The second question is,
  • 01:01:51do you believe it is
  • 01:01:53addressable from pathologist?
  • 01:01:56Besides perspective,
  • 01:01:56you know we certainly wanted to have
  • 01:01:58more people coming into our field,
  • 01:02:01but we do not know for sure whether
  • 01:02:03or not it is because we haven't done
  • 01:02:07enough to the students or this is just
  • 01:02:11something really beyond our control.
  • 01:02:13I think that's kind of the question
  • 01:02:15people just trying to figure it out.
  • 01:02:17So what do you want to hear?
  • 01:02:18You know your perspective on that?
  • 01:02:20Yeah, that's the $1,000,000 question.
  • 01:02:22Right now my my personal.
  • 01:02:25These are my personal opinion.
  • 01:02:27'cause I think you know the
  • 01:02:29integrated curriculum and the the
  • 01:02:32condensation of the curriculum.
  • 01:02:34Has really diminished the
  • 01:02:36students exposure to pathology.
  • 01:02:38Uhm, you know,
  • 01:02:39for us we have a our first years
  • 01:02:42condensed down into about six
  • 01:02:44months and then second year is
  • 01:02:46the next calendar year and then
  • 01:02:48they begin the clerkships right
  • 01:02:51after that in the in our in the
  • 01:02:53in the abbreviated second year.
  • 01:02:55Or I guess the the 2nd that starts later.
  • 01:02:57Pathology is a component of
  • 01:02:59each organ system block,
  • 01:03:01but the students are more focused
  • 01:03:03on learning the pharmacology.
  • 01:03:04The more focused on learning.
  • 01:03:05What they feel are the higher yield
  • 01:03:08things that they will be tested on.
  • 01:03:11With that said,
  • 01:03:11I think there are opportunities
  • 01:03:13for us as pathologists too.
  • 01:03:17Advocate more strongly for better
  • 01:03:20representation in the curriculum
  • 01:03:22and for those of us that are either
  • 01:03:25pathology block directors or involved
  • 01:03:28with any of the courses for creating
  • 01:03:31novel experiences to highlight
  • 01:03:33how pathologists are a key member
  • 01:03:35of the multidisciplinary team.
  • 01:03:37So for example, I Co direct a short,
  • 01:03:40very short three day course on
  • 01:03:42neoplasia and one of the things
  • 01:03:44that we do as a mock tumor board.
  • 01:03:46And so I have myself I have Realogy.
  • 01:03:48I have radiation oncology.
  • 01:03:50I have surgery and medical oncology all
  • 01:03:52represented in this mock Schumer board.
  • 01:03:55We go through a mock case and we show
  • 01:03:57we talk about the pathology just as if
  • 01:04:00we would as a as a as at a tumor board.
  • 01:04:03And so the students get an opportunity
  • 01:04:04to see what we as the pathologists do,
  • 01:04:06that they might not have normally
  • 01:04:08had an opportunity to see.
  • 01:04:10And at that point in their medical education.
  • 01:04:15I think other institutions are doing
  • 01:04:16similar novel things where they have
  • 01:04:18like a transition to the wards.
  • 01:04:20Courseware pathology is included
  • 01:04:21as in a transition towards course,
  • 01:04:23but I think that happens
  • 01:04:24too late to be honest.
  • 01:04:25So I think if you if for those of
  • 01:04:27us that again are involved with you
  • 01:04:29and me trying to think creatively
  • 01:04:31about how you can incorporate,
  • 01:04:33you know the pathologists you
  • 01:04:35know told the clinical team that
  • 01:04:38XYZ or something to that extent
  • 01:04:40highlighting that pathologists were
  • 01:04:42an instrumental role in the diagnosis
  • 01:04:44and the subsequent care plan.
  • 01:04:46Is really important,
  • 01:04:49but in terms of,
  • 01:04:49you know why we're seeing at the client.
  • 01:04:51I think it is partially because of that
  • 01:04:53where it is unclear to the students that we,
  • 01:04:55as pathologists are critical to
  • 01:04:57multidisciplinary care and there are
  • 01:05:00different ways that you can contribute
  • 01:05:02to patient care without you know doing
  • 01:05:04an autopsy as a pathologist and that
  • 01:05:06most of us don't do. People don't.
  • 01:05:07Most of us don't do autopsies.
  • 01:05:09Or if we do, do autopsies.
  • 01:05:11Autopsies have very different applications
  • 01:05:13now than they did historically,
  • 01:05:15where we have rapid autopsy programs.
  • 01:05:17Where you're.
  • 01:05:17An instrumental member of Cancer Research.
  • 01:05:20By doing rapid autopsies and harvesting
  • 01:05:22tissue for our colleagues in basic sciences.
  • 01:05:25I think again,
  • 01:05:26highlighting the role of pathology
  • 01:05:28at the roles of pathologists or as
  • 01:05:30early as possible are important.
  • 01:05:32And being that smiling face that
  • 01:05:35they want to see so. Thank you.
  • 01:05:42So that's it.
  • 01:05:43Yes, doctor white.
  • 01:05:44Thank you so much for your presentation.
  • 01:05:47I really enjoyed it and I found it
  • 01:05:49extremely educational and and and and
  • 01:05:50one of the reasons for this is that I I
  • 01:05:53trained in Morehouse School of Medicine,
  • 01:05:55I was a postdoctoral fellow there.
  • 01:05:58It's very interesting that till now I did not
  • 01:06:01know that the greydis etch what that meant.
  • 01:06:04Yeah, and it was for shocking that
  • 01:06:06nobody actually ever ever told
  • 01:06:07us what the Bradys ever meant.
  • 01:06:09Yeah, so thank you so much.
  • 01:06:11And for teaching us and telling us I have.
  • 01:06:16I do have a question.
  • 01:06:17I don't know whether you have an answer
  • 01:06:19because you didn't write that paper,
  • 01:06:20but that Ginther ET al paper graph.
  • 01:06:26I think rather confusing.
  • 01:06:27I don't know how they have crunched
  • 01:06:30those numbers off the R 01.
  • 01:06:32Success rates that shows between
  • 01:06:35various racial groups.
  • 01:06:37Yeah, the potential biases that
  • 01:06:39exist in terms of success rates,
  • 01:06:42because I don't know whether that
  • 01:06:44shows whether that data really,
  • 01:06:45truly represents what's actually
  • 01:06:47going on in terms of biases.
  • 01:06:49Because if you look at the graphs,
  • 01:06:51you notice that the Hispanics have
  • 01:06:54the same success rate as whites,
  • 01:06:56and I wonder whether that is
  • 01:06:59because of some sort of.
  • 01:07:02Incorrect analysis,
  • 01:07:03or whether there is truly
  • 01:07:06a difference that exists,
  • 01:07:07that many of the African American applicants,
  • 01:07:10or perhaps from the HBC US like
  • 01:07:14Morehouse and their environment,
  • 01:07:16is judged perhaps in properly by
  • 01:07:18certain reviewers as not appropriate.
  • 01:07:21I wonder if you have any comments
  • 01:07:23to elaborate on that.
  • 01:07:25Maybe in your next presentation
  • 01:07:26you could expound on that mode.
  • 01:07:29Yeah,
  • 01:07:29so I think that I'm linking.
  • 01:07:32Proper number I think there there is
  • 01:07:34a paper that looks at institutional
  • 01:07:36bias in terms of granting the
  • 01:07:39the the granting of grants.
  • 01:07:43Use the same words in a sentence.
  • 01:07:45There are institutional biases against
  • 01:07:48institutions that you mentioned,
  • 01:07:49like Morehouse or smaller institutions,
  • 01:07:51which hopefully that is diminishing now
  • 01:07:53now that especially during the pandemic,
  • 01:07:55a lot of these institutions
  • 01:07:57have gotten greater notoriety,
  • 01:07:58but there were some biases,
  • 01:07:59and so I think that may be a
  • 01:08:01confounder as you mentioned,
  • 01:08:02since that those institutions are
  • 01:08:04enriched for black individuals or
  • 01:08:06individuals help identify as black
  • 01:08:08in terms of why there are not,
  • 01:08:10why there are not significant
  • 01:08:12disparities in Hispanic I.
  • 01:08:13I will have to go back and look at the paper,
  • 01:08:15but I will say that Hispanic
  • 01:08:17representation has been increasing
  • 01:08:19and that is the one subcategory
  • 01:08:21within the URM category that has been
  • 01:08:23increasing at a significant rate,
  • 01:08:25at least in pathology.
  • 01:08:27And then you know,
  • 01:08:29looking at looking at that.
  • 01:08:30So I, I, you wonder,
  • 01:08:32I I'm not sure if again we're
  • 01:08:36looking at aggregated data, right?
  • 01:08:38So I'm not sure if these are.
  • 01:08:40If we're looking at individuals
  • 01:08:41that are also, you know, coming in.
  • 01:08:44Internationally or what type or what exactly?
  • 01:08:47Again,
  • 01:08:48we need to look at disaggregated
  • 01:08:49data you know.
  • 01:08:50Looking at,
  • 01:08:51you know the data for Black or
  • 01:08:52African Americans when we look
  • 01:08:54at the actual number of African
  • 01:08:55American males in isolation,
  • 01:08:57the number of African American
  • 01:08:58males has not changed at all,
  • 01:08:59but the overall number of African of
  • 01:09:01individuals who identify as black
  • 01:09:03or African American have increased
  • 01:09:05the number of black or African
  • 01:09:07American males has increased.
  • 01:09:08When we look at African American males,
  • 01:09:10it has not,
  • 01:09:11and we're looking at African
  • 01:09:12males from the African continent.
  • 01:09:14Those numbers have increased,
  • 01:09:15so again I have to be really careful,
  • 01:09:18and so I agree with you.
  • 01:09:19I I will go back and look more
  • 01:09:20carefully at that,
  • 01:09:21but I think there there have been data
  • 01:09:24suggesting an institutional bias is yes.
  • 01:09:28Thank you.
  • 01:09:30They were really late on time,
  • 01:09:32but I would assume are yeah.
  • 01:09:36Yeah, if we have time, is it OK?
  • 01:09:38Go ahead, go ahead last one so I'm
  • 01:09:41one of the Apqp residents are pgy 3.
  • 01:09:45I just want to say this is so amazing,
  • 01:09:47especially your work in the community and
  • 01:09:50I was wondering if you guys have and I'm
  • 01:09:52sorry if you said this and I missed it.
  • 01:09:54I did have to take a couple
  • 01:09:55calls during your presentation,
  • 01:09:56but do you guys have resident
  • 01:09:58involvement in all of these programs
  • 01:10:01and just how you implement that?
  • 01:10:03Yeah, thanks for asking so when Doctor
  • 01:10:06where was a resident she was involved.
  • 01:10:10I asked residents if they're interested,
  • 01:10:12but of course their work comes
  • 01:10:13first and so I make it explicitly
  • 01:10:16clear that their clinical service
  • 01:10:18and they're studying comes first.
  • 01:10:20We have some residents right now
  • 01:10:22that have expressed interest,
  • 01:10:23particularly first first year in
  • 01:10:25the third year that are interested,
  • 01:10:27but they are waiting until they
  • 01:10:28have a little more time and things
  • 01:10:30have been kind of unpaused.
  • 01:10:31They have met one on one.
  • 01:10:33With some of our students when asked,
  • 01:10:36but those were again small.
  • 01:10:37One on one meetings with one student at Hawk,
  • 01:10:41but not formally in terms of the outreach,
  • 01:10:43but it's mostly been just asking,
  • 01:10:45asking the resident or asking the Chiefs
  • 01:10:47to ask the residents if there's anyone
  • 01:10:49that's interested, and then again,
  • 01:10:51you clinical services come first.
  • 01:10:54But yeah, thank you for your question
  • 01:10:56and thank you for logging in.
  • 01:10:57Yeah, thank you so much.
  • 01:10:59This is also great.
  • 01:11:01Thanks
  • 01:11:02let's altogether thank Doctor. Right
  • 01:11:03again. Thank you, thank you so much and
  • 01:11:06you're going into a meeting
  • 01:11:08with our chair, right?
  • 01:11:11OK, do I leave this one or stay here.
  • 01:11:13I have no idea in from a link
  • 01:11:16I will come to the link again.
  • 01:11:20Thank you. Thanks everybody.
  • 01:11:22Thank you so much Tina,
  • 01:11:23I really appreciate it. It's
  • 01:11:24a pleasure. Thank you.
  • 01:11:26Right, you know, thank you.